Superconducting non-destructive readout circuits

ABSTRACT

Non-destructive read out (NDRO) circuits are provided for use in reciprocal quantum logic (RQL) superconducting systems. Each NDRO circuit includes a “body” circuit that provides a single or multi-state sub-critical bias current to one or many independent “tail” circuitries. Each “tail” has minimal effect on the “body” thereby preventing any interference or destruction to the state of the “body” circuitry. The circuits reduce device count and thereby increase circuit density, simplify and reduce the cost of fabrication, and provide functionality not available in existing designs, such as the ability to write a state and read it in the same operation cycle. The NDRO circuits provide more compact unit cells useful in memory or logic arrays, demanding fewer resources with increased functionality. The circuits also provide compact cells for AND, AND-OR, A-NOT-B, inverter, multiplexer, and demultiplexer gates.

GOVERNMENT INTEREST

The invention was made under Government Contract NumberW911NF-14-C-0115. Therefore, the US Government has rights to theinvention as specified in that contract.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/700,615, filed on Dec. 2, 2019, which claims priority to U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 16/051,058, filed Jul. 31, 2018, which issued asU.S. Pat. No. 10,554,207 on Feb. 4, 2020, and which is incorporatedherein in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to quantum and classical digitalsuperconducting circuits, and specifically to superconductingnon-destructive readout circuits.

BACKGROUND

In the field of digital logic, extensive use is made of well known andhighly developed complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS)technology. As CMOS has begun to approach maturity as a technology,there is an interest in alternatives that may lead to higher performancein terms of speed, power dissipation computational density, interconnectbandwidth, and the like. An alternative to CMOS technology comprisessuperconductor based single flux quantum circuitry, utilizingsuperconducting Josephson junctions, with typical signal power of around4 nanowatts (nW), at a typical data rate of 20 gigabits per second(Gb/s) or greater, and operating temperatures of around 4 kelvins.

A non-destructive readout (NDRO) circuit is a circuit that can retrievea stored information state (e.g., one or multiple bits) for transmissionto other circuitry for processing or output without erasing, destroying,changing, or otherwise corrupting the stored information state. For thepurposes of this application, the term should not be interpreted toinclude circuits that destructively retrieve a stored information statebut then thereafter perform a restorative write-back.

Latches and flip-flops are circuits that can be used to store stateinformation and to change state by signals applied to one or morecontrol inputs. In modern computing and communications electronics,these are basic storage elements in memories and sequential logic. Alatch is asynchronous, with its output changing as soon as its datainput does (or at least after a small propagation delay), provided thelatch is enabled via an enable input. A flip-flop is synchronous andedge-triggered and only changes state when a clocking control signalgoes from high to low or low to high. Thus, a conventional D flip-flop,e.g., one implemented in CMOS, has two binary inputs, a data input D anda clock input, and at least one output, Q. The D flip-flop captures thevalue of the D input at a definite portion of an input clock cycle,e.g., a rising edge or a falling edge, known as the capture time. Thatcaptured value becomes the Q output. The output Q does not change exceptat the capture time (or some small propagation delay thereafter). Inpractical implementations it is required that a data input D be stablefor some setup time prior to the capture time and for some hold timeafter the capture time for the input to be reliably captured andpropagated to the output. A conventional D latch, with an enable inputrather than a clock input, behaves similarly, except that the output canchange according to the data input so long as an enable input remainsasserted.

In the context of superconducting reciprocal quantum logic (RQL)circuits, phase-mode logic (PML) allows digital values to be encoded assuperconducting phases of one or more Josephson junctions. For example,a logical “1” may be encoded as a high phase and a logical “0” may beencoded as a low phase. For example, the phases may be encoded as beingzero radians (meaning, e.g., logical “0”) or 2π radians (meaning, e.g.,logical “1”). These values persist across RQL AC clock cycles in PMLbecause there is no requirement for a reciprocal pulse to reset theJosephson junctions phase. In contrast to PML, in wave-pipelined logic(WPL), a logical “1” is encoded as a positive single flux quantum (SFQ)pulse followed by a reciprocal negative pulse, whereas a logical “0” isencoded as the absence of either such pulse.

SUMMARY

One example includes a reciprocal quantum logic (RQL) non-destructivereadout (NDRO) gate that includes a body circuit and one or more tailcircuits connected to the body circuit. The body circuit has at leastone single flux quantum (SFQ) logical input. The body circuit isconfigured to store at least one logical state. Each tail circuit in theNDRO gate includes a tail input inductor connected between an NDROread-enable input port and the body circuit and configured to receive anSFQ pulse NDRO read-enable signal on the NDRO read-enable input port, atail Josephson junction connected between the body circuit and a circuitground, and a tail output inductor connected between the body circuitand an NDRO output port and configured to transmit an SFQ pulse NDROoutput signal based on the stored logical state and the NDRO read-enablesignal without affecting the stored logical state.

Another example includes an RQL demultiplexer circuit (demux). The demuxhas respective ports for a selector input, a data input, a first output,and a second output. The demux further has a selector Josephson junctionconnected between a first node and a circuit ground and configured totrigger upon assertion of a selector input signal from the selectorinput port. The demux further has first and second circuit branchesdiverging from the first node and converging at a second node configuredto receive the data input at the data input port. The first branchincludes an inductor connected between the first node and a second node.The first branch further includes a pulse generator connected to thesecond node, comprising two Josephson junctions and an AC bias source.The first branch further includes an escape Josephson junction connectedbetween the second node and a third node. The first branch furtherincludes a first output Josephson junction connected between the thirdnode and the circuit ground. The second branch includes an inductorconnected between the first node and a fourth node. The second branchfurther includes a second output Josephson junctions connected between afifth node and the circuit ground. The second branch further includes athird output Josephson junction connected between the fourth node andthe circuit ground. Non-assertion or assertion of the selector signalrespectively selects between a signal arriving on the data input portbeing propagated through the third node to the first output port, or thesignal arriving on the data input port being propagated through thefifth and fourth nodes to the second output port.

Yet another example includes an RQL central processing unit (CPU) thatincludes a register file having an array of RQL non-destructive readout(NDRO) gate circuits. Each NDRO gate circuit includes a body circuithaving one of a D latch or a D flip-flop configured to store a logicalstate. Each body circuit is connected to at least two tail circuits inthe NDRO gate circuit and is configured to supply a pre-critical statecurrent to a respective tail Josephson junction in each of the at leasttwo tail circuits. Each pre-critical state current is representative ofthe same stored logical state. Each tail circuit is configured topropagate to an NDRO output port of the respective tail circuit anoutput signal corresponding to the logical AND of the stored logicalstate with a respective NRDO read enable signal provided to an NDROinput port of the respective tail circuit. The propagation of any outputsignal from any of the tail circuits does not affect the logical statestored in the body circuit connected to said tail circuits. Each bodycircuit in the register file array of NDRO gate circuits can include adata input port and a logical clock input port. Word lines of theregister file can be connected to the logical clock input ports of thebody circuits across word-lines of the respective NDRO gate circuits inthe array, and bit lines of the register file can be connected to theNDRO inputs of the tail circuits of the NDRO gate circuits in the array.Each NDRO gate circuit in the array can be configured to have itslogical state both writable and readable in the same operation cycle.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block/circuit diagram of an example reciprocal quantum logic(RQL) is non-destructive readout (NDRO) gate.

FIG. 2 is a logical block diagram for an example RQL single-read NDROregister.

FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL single-read NDRO register.

FIG. 4 is a logical block diagram for an example RQL dual-read NDROregister.

FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL dual-read NDRO register.

FIG. 6 is a logical block diagram for an example RQL single-read NDROregister.

FIG. 7 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL single-read NDRO registerhaving a body-tail topology.

FIG. 8 is a logical block diagram for an example RQL dual-read NDROregister.

FIG. 9 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL dual-read NDRO registerhaving a body-tail topology.

FIG. 10 a timing diagram for the RQL single-read NDRO register circuitof FIG. 7.

FIG. 11 is a circuit diagram of another example RQL single-read NDROregister having a body-tail topology.

FIG. 12 is a circuit diagram of another example RQL dual-read NDROregister having a body-tail topology.

FIG. 13 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL single-read NDROregister, having a body-tail topology, that is flip-flop-based ratherthan latch-based.

FIG. 14 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL multiplexer.

FIG. 15 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL AND-OR gate.

FIG. 16 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL demultiplexer.

FIG. 17 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL AND gate.

FIG. 18 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL A-NOT-B gate.

FIG. 19 is a circuit diagram of an example RQL inverter (NOT gate).

FIG. 20 is an oscilloscope screenshot capture of measured waveforms forthe RQL single-read NDRO register circuit of FIG. 7.

FIG. 21 is a block diagram of an example array of multi-tail NDRO gates.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A non-destructive readout (NDRO) circuit topology includes one or morereadout “tails” used to propagate, as one or more non-destructive outputsignals, a state stored in a logical circuit “body” to which the one ormore tails are connected. In part because signals used to triggerreadout and the output signals corresponding to the stored state can bepropagated as single flux quantum (SFQ) pulses, the readout circuittopology is compatible with circuit designs of the reciprocal quantumlogic (RQL) family of superconducting logic for ultra-low-powersuperconducting computing. The examples provided herein expand andimprove on RQL technology in many areas of logic and memory circuitry,in terms of reducing device count, improving functionality, andminimizing or eliminating large transformers.

FIG. 1 is a block/circuit diagram of an example NDRO gate 100, whichincludes body 110 and one or more tails 112. The logical circuit 114 inthe body provides a single or multi-state sub-critical bias current toan integer number P of independent circuitries 112, one or more, eachreferred to herein as a tail. Logical circuit 114 of the body 110 has aninteger number N of input(s), one or more, upon which any type of logicoperation or logical gate functionality can be performed by logicalcircuit 114 in order to produce one or more outputs each stored as aninternal state of body 110. Thus, body 110 can have one or many (i.e.,P) internal states that can produce a combination of independentpre-critical state bias currents (I_(PCS_1) through I_(PCS_P)) suppliedto one or many (i.e., P) tails 112. All inputs and pre-critical statecurrents can be encoded either in wave-pipelined or phase-mode logic.The states can be non-transitory inasmuch as they can persist in thebody until changed by inputs to the body. The body outputs to thetail(s) are not considered as inputs to the body since the gate 100 isan NDRO readout gate.

In FIG. 1, first tail TAIL₁ is provided a first pre-critical statecurrent I_(PCS_1) from logical circuit 114, while Pth tail TAIL_(P) isprovided a Pth pre-critical state current I_(PCS_P) from logical circuit114. Each tail is also provided a non-destructive readout enable signalNDRO_(IN_1) through NDRO_(IN_P), respectively, and outputs a read outputsignal NDRO_(OUT_1) through NDRO_(OUT_P), respectively, these outputsignals corresponding to the state of logical circuit 114.

Each tail 112 can consist of as few as three components. Specifically,each tail 112 can consist of as little as just one Josephson junction(e.g., JJ₁, JJ_(P)) having an input end and a grounded end, an inputinductor (e.g., L_(IN_1), L_(IN_P)) connected to the input end of theJosephson junction through which the input non-destructive readoutenable signal (e.g., NDRO_(IN_1), NDRO_(IN_P)) is supplied, and anoutput inductor (e.g., L_(OUT_1), L_(OUT_P)) connected to the input endof the Josephson junction through which an output non-destructivereadout signal (e.g., NDRO_(OUT_1), NDRO_(OUT_P)) is supplied to othercircuitry (not shown). Josephson transmission lines (JTLs) (not shown inFIG. 1) can be connected to the NDRO input and output of each tail 112to carry SFQ pulses to and from the tails.

Thus, in an example, logical circuit 114 can provide the functionalityof a simple memory storage element such as a flip-flop or latch,effectively storing one bit of data. In other examples, logical circuit114 can be a logical gate or any combination of logical gates, includingAND, OR, XOR, and NOT (i.e., inverter) gates, multiplexers,demultiplexers, and shift registers. The pre-critical state currentsI_(PCS_1) through I_(PCS_P) can represent a multiplicity of states or,in some examples, they can all represent a single state. In any case,logical circuit 114 supplies its logical state(s) to be output to theone or more tails 112. Each tail 112 has minimal effect on the body,thereby preventing any interference or destruction to the state of thebody circuitry 114.

NDRO gate 100 thus uses a state-produced pre-critical bias current frombody logical circuitry 114 to pre-critically bias a Josephson junction,JJ₁ through JJ_(P), in the circuitry of each tail 112, allowing eachtail 112 to act as an output enabler, in other words, effectivelyproviding a logical AND between the state of the body logical circuitry114 and a corresponding non-destructive readout enable signal,NDRO_(IN_1) through NDRO_(IN_P). This NDRO input of any tail 112 readsand outputs the internal state inside the body 110 without disruptingthe internal state inside the body 110. The body 110 can becombinational logic in nature or not at all, and thus, can have one ormultiple inputs and one or multiple outputs to its associated tails 112.

FIGS. 2-5 illustrate logical diagrams for registers 200, 400 andcorresponding superconducting register circuits 300, 500 that do not usethe body-tail architecture of FIG. 1 but instead build registers withD-latch and AND-gate stages. FIG. 2 shows a logical block diagram for anexample RQL single-read NDRO register 200 that is implemented bycombining circuitry for a D latch 202 with circuitry for an AND gate204. A data input signal DI provided to the data input D of D latch 202is stored as an output state Q upon being “latched” by an assertion oflogical clock signal LCLK provided to enable input E of D latch 202.This signal is logically ANDed with a read enable signal RE by AND gate204, the output of which is the read output signal QO. An intermediaryJosephson transmission line (JTL) can be provided between D latch 202and AND gate 204, and/or between AND gate 204 and a circuit (not shown)that receives output signal QO, for signal amplification, signaldistance transmission, and signal isolation purposes.

FIG. 3 shows a circuit diagram implementing the single-read register 200of FIG. 2 as an example RQL-compatible superconducting circuit 300. Aninput stage 302 of circuit 300 includes two input ports DI and LCLK,three Josephson junctions J2, J3, and J4, two input inductors L1 and L2,and a first transformer for inductively coupling a DC flux bias from aDC flux bias line. Input stage 302 corresponds to, and provides thefunctionality of, D latch 202 from FIG. 2. An output stage 304 ofcircuit 300 includes an input port RE, an output port QO, two inductorsL3, L4, two Josephson junctions J5, J6, and a second transformer forinductively coupling a DC flux bias from a DC flux bias line. Outputstage 304 corresponds to, and provides the functionality of, AND gate204 from FIG. 2. An intermediary JTL can be provided between input stage302 and output stage 304, and/or between output stage 304 and a circuit(not shown) that receives output signal QO, for signal amplification,signal distance transmission, and signal isolation purposes.

FIG. 4 shows a logical block diagram for an example dual-read register400 that is implemented by combining circuitry for a D latch 402 withcircuitry for two AND gates 404, 406. As shown in logical diagram 400,the output of the D latch 402 is forked between the two AND gates 404,406. The functioning of D-latch 402 and each AND gate 404, 406 is thesame as has been described above with respect to FIG. 2. A data inputsignal DI provided to the data input D of D latch 402 is stored as anoutput state Q upon being “latched” by an assertion of logical clocksignal LCLK provided to enable input E of D latch 402. This outputsignal is logically ANDed with each of two read enable signals RE_A andRE_B by AND gates 404, 406, respectively, the outputs of which are theread output signals QO_A and QO_B. As discussed above, intermediary JTLscan be provided between D latch 402 and AND gates 404, 406 and/orbetween AND gates 404, 406 and circuits (not shown) that receive outputsignals QO_A and QO_B, for signal amplification, signal distancetransmission, and signal isolation purposes.

FIG. 5 shows a circuit diagram implementing the dual-read register 400of FIG. 4 as an example RQL-compatible superconducting circuit 500.Input stage 502 of circuit 500 includes two input ports DI and LCLK,three Josephson junctions J2, J3, and J4, two input inductors L1 and L2,and a first transformer for inductively coupling a DC flux bias from aDC flux bias line. Input stage 502 corresponds to, and provides thefunctionality of, D latch 402 from FIG. 4. First output stage 504 ofcircuit 500 includes an input port RE_A, an output port QO_A, twoinductors L3_A, L4_A, two Josephson junctions J5_A, J6_A, and a secondtransformer for inductively coupling a DC flux bias from a DC flux biasline. First output stage 504 corresponds to, and provides thefunctionality of, AND gate 404 from FIG. 4. Second output stage 506 ofcircuit 500 includes an input port RE_B, an output port QO_B, twoinductors L3_B, L4_B, two Josephson junctions J5_B, J6_B, and a thirdtransformer for inductively coupling a DC flux bias from a DC flux biasline. Second output stage 506 corresponds to, and provides thefunctionality of, AND gate 406 from FIG. 4.

Between input stage 502 and output stages 504, 506, fork stage 503 canprovide an output signal from input stage 502 as input signals to eachof output stages 504, 506. Fork stage 503 includes three Josephsonjunctions JF1, JF2_A, and JF2_B, four inductors LF1, LF2, LF3_A, andLF3_B, and a fifth inductor LF_CLK to an AC bias signal source AC CLK.Intermediary JTLs can be provided between input stage 502 and fork stage503, and/or between output stages 504, 506 and circuits (not shown) thatreceive output signals QO_A, QO_B, for signal amplification, signaldistance transmission, and signal isolation purposes.

Circuits 300 and 500, as logically symbolized in diagrams 200 and 400,respectively, each connect a D-latch output to one or more AND gates viaJTL(s) depending on the number of read ports desired. Despite theirsuperficial simplicity, device count and resource utilization isrelatively high in these designs. In addition to this, the illustratedconfigurations lack the functionality of being able to read and write atthe same time, which is a desirable performance feature for a registerfile to have in the realm of CPU architecture.

Dual-read register circuit 500 of FIG. 5 is relatively complicated, hasa high part count (having 24 components not including those in JTLs,ports, and AC bias source), and relatively high resource utilization(e.g., requiring three DC flux bias line connections as well as AC biassource connections to power the JTLs and fork stage 503). However, inview of the purpose of circuit 500 as implementing the logicalfunctionality illustrated in block diagram 400 of FIG. 4, it may not beapparent how circuit 500 might be simplified given that and each of itsstages 502, 503, 504, 506 implements a logical component or signal splitfrom diagram 400. Additionally, the need for signal propagation (fromleft to right in the circuits as illustrated) means that circuits 300and 500 do not permit writing a data input signal and reading that samedata input signal at substantially the same time (e.g., within the sameoperation cycle). The examples of FIGS. 6-9 reconceptualize the logicaldesigns and implementations of FIGS. 2-5, reducing part count whileproviding improved functionality, e.g., by permitting simultaneouswriting of a state and reading of the written state. In view of theseexamples, it is clear that even single-read register circuit 300 of FIG.3 is unduly complicated and has a higher part count than desirable.

FIG. 6 shows a logical block diagram for an example single-read RQLD-register 600 that has at least all of the functionality of single-readregister 200 from FIG. 2 but is capable of providing non-destructivereadout without the D-latch-to-AND-gate staging shown in FIGS. 2 and 3.A data input signal DI provided to the data input D of NDRO-latch 602 isstored as an internal state of NDRO-latch 602 upon being “latched” by anassertion of logical clock signal LCLK provided to the same-named inputof NDRO-latch 602. Upon assertion of a non-destructive readout signalNDRO, provided to input NDROA of NDRO-latch 602, which can besubstantially contemporaneous with (e.g., within the same operationcycle as) the logical clock signal assertion, the internal state is readout from output Q as read output signal QO.

FIG. 7 shows a circuit diagram implementing the single-read RQLD-register 600 of FIG. 6 as an example RQL-compatible superconductingcircuit 700. Body stage 702 of circuit 700 includes two input ports DIand LCLK, three Josephson junctions J2, J3, and J4, two input inductorsL1 and L2, and transformer(s) for inductively coupling a DC flux biasfrom a DC flux bias line. At circuit initialization, the DC flux biastransformers bias Josephson junction J2 with a fraction of a Φ₀ offset(e.g., ½ Φ₀). (Φ₀ is a single flux quantum, equal to approximately 2.07mA-pH.) Body stage 702 can correspond to body 110 in FIG. 1. Tail stage704 of circuit 700 includes an input port NDRO, an output port QO, oneinductor L3, and one Josephson junction J5. Tail stage 704 cancorrespond to a tail 112 in FIG. 1. Body stage 702 can be connected totail stage 704 by a linking inductor LL. A more detailed description ofthe functioning of the single-read register circuit 700 of FIG. 7follows with reference to the simulation timing diagram 1000 of FIG. 10.

Tail stage 704 does not have two Josephson junctions, nor does it have asecond transformer for inductively coupling a DC flux bias from a DCflux bias line, as may be found in the output stage 304 of FIG. 3.Circuit 700 also does not include an intermediary JTL between body stage702 and tail stage 704, although a JTL may, as illustrated in FIG. 7, beprovided between tail stage 704 and a circuit (not shown) that receivesoutput signal QO, for signal amplification, signal distancetransmission, and signal isolation purposes.

FIG. 8 shows a logical block diagram for an example dual-read RQLD-register 800 that has at least all of the functionality of dual-readregister 400 from FIG. 4 but is capable of providing non-destructivereadout without the D-latch-to-AND-gate staging shown in FIGS. 4 and 5.A data input signal DI provided to the data input D of NDRO-latch 802 isstored as an internal state of NDRO-latch 802 upon being “latched” by anassertion of logical clock signal LCLK provided to the same-named inputof NDRO-latch 802. Upon assertion of a first non-destructive readoutsignal NDRO_A, provided to input NDROA of NDRO-latch 802, which can besubstantially contemporaneous with (e.g., within the same operationcycle as) the logical clock signal assertion, the internal state is readout from output QA as read output signal QO_A. Upon assertion of asecond non-destructive readout signal NDRO_B, provided to input NDROB ofNDRO-latch 802, which can be substantially contemporaneous with (e.g.,within the same operation cycle as) the logical clock signal assertion,the internal state is read out from output QB as read output signalQO_B.

FIG. 9 shows a circuit diagram implementing the dual-read RQL D-register800 of FIG. 8 as an example RQL-compatible superconducting circuit 900.Body stage 902 of circuit 900 includes two input ports DI and LCLK,three Josephson junctions J2, J3, and J4, two input inductors L1 and L2,and transformer(s) for inductively coupling a DC flux bias from a DCflux bias line. Body stage 902 can correspond to body 110 in FIG. 1.First and second tail stages 904, 906 of circuit 900 include respectiveinput ports NDRO_A, NDRO_B, respective output ports QO_A, QO_B,respective inductors L3_A, L3_B, and respective Josephson junctionsJ5_A, J5_B. Tail stages 904, 906 can correspond to tails 112 in FIG. 1.Body stage 902 can be connected to tail stages 904, 906 by a linkinginductors LL_A, LL_B.

The functioning of the body stage 902 and tail stages 904, 906 incircuit 900 of FIG. 9 is substantially the same as the functioning ofbody stage 702 and tail stage 704 in circuit 700 of FIG. 7, except that,since in the particular example of circuit 900 both tail stages 904, 906are connected to the same “output” of body stage 902 and thus receivethe same stored state from body stage 902, the output current from bodystage 902 is required to be large enough to drive two tails instead ofone. Consequently, the sizes of the Josephson junction devices in bodystage 902 may be larger as compared to those in body stage 702 ofcircuit 700.

In circuit 900, tail stages 904, 906 do not have two Josephson junctionseach, nor do they each have a second transformer for inductivelycoupling a DC flux bias from a DC flux bias line, as may be found in theoutput stages 504, 506 of FIG. 5. Circuit 900 also does not includeintermediary JTLs between body stage 902 and tail stages 904, 906,although JTLs may, as illustrated in FIG. 9, be provided between tailstages 904, 906 and respective circuits (not shown) that receive outputsignals QO_A, QO_B, these JTLs being for the purposes of signalamplification, signal distance transmission, and signal isolation.

Summarizing the component-economy structural advantages of body/tailcircuits 700 and 900 over D-latch/AND-gate circuits 300 and 500,respectively, single-read body/tail circuit 700 uses four Josephsonjunctions and one JTL whereas single-read D-latch/AND-gate circuit 300uses five Josephson junctions and two JTLs, for a savings of oneJosephson junction and one JTL (which itself includes one or moreJosephson junctions); dual-read body/tail circuit 900 uses fiveJosephson junctions and two JTLs as compared to the ten Josephsonjunctions and three JTLs used in D-latch/AND-gate dual-read circuit 500,for a savings of five Josephson junctions and one JTL. Furthermore,dual-read body/tail circuit 900 has fewer inductors and fewer inductivecouplings than dual-read D-latch/AND-gate circuit 500. Since a reductionin number of Josephson junctions and inductors leads to a higher countof memory cells or logic cells per fabricated die area or chip area,example body/tail circuits 700 and 900 reduce cost by greatly increasingdensity of a memory array or logic array.

FIG. 10 presents a timing diagram 1000 illustrating the functioning ofthe RQL single-read NDRO register circuit 700 of FIG. 7. Each of sevenplots in diagram 1000 is presented as a function of time in nanoseconds.The DI signal plot represents a data input provided to the circuit toset a circuit state, e.g., a memory or logic state. The LCLK signal plotrepresents a logical clock input that acts as a write enable signal. TheNDRO signal plot represents a non-destructive readout input that acts asa read enable signal. The QO signal plot represents a non-destructivereadout output that can be provided as an input signal to anothercircuit. Also included to assist in understanding the functioning ofcircuit 700 are the superconducting phases of Josephson junctions J2,J4, J5, and J3, where phase is defined as the time-integral of voltageat every node. Text legends along the top of the timing diagram specifythe circuit operation invoked, i.e., the underlying meaning of theparticular combination of inputs and output, according to the followingtruth table, where “previous state” is indicated by the phase ofJosephson junction J2 during the end of the previous operation cycle:

Previous New DI LCLK NDRO state state QO No inputs 0 0 0 0 or 1 Prev. 0Read 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Read 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 Write 0 0 1 0 0 or 1 0 0 Write 0and read 0 1 1 0 or 1 0 0 Half select (no read) 1 0 0 0 or 1 Prev. 0Half-select (with read 1 0 1 0 0 0 0) Half-select (with read 1 0 1 1 11 1) Write 1 1 1 0 0 or 1 1 0 Write 1 and read 1 1 1 0 or 1 1 1

For each operation cycle, NDRO (i.e., read enable) input signals aretimed to come after a set-up and hold time from the beginning of anyLCLK (i.e., write enable), such that a data value written to the bodystage 702 can be read out from the tail stage 704 within the sameoperation cycle. This timing can be enforced by support circuitryoutside of circuit 700 and can employ, for example, JTLs configured toprovide various signal time delays. A “half-select” condition is definedas an application of a logical “high” signal to data input DI without acorresponding logical “high” write enable signal on logical clock inputLCLK.

Single-read RQL D-register circuit 700 uses the phase of Joseph junctionJ2 in body stage 702 to encode a stored state value and to source astable pre-critical bias current to Josephson junction J5 in tail stage704. Although this pre-critical bias current is insufficient to causeJosephson junction J5 to trigger, it sufficiently biases Josephsonjunction J5 such that its triggering is directly correlated to the valueof the non-destructive readout input signal NDRO. Specifically, apositive NDRO pulse will trigger Josephson junction J5 and thereby sendout an SFQ pulse to output QO, and a negative NDRO pulse will resetJosephson junction J5. The bias from input NDRO can be made weak, andisolation between the tail stage 704 to the body stage 702 (i.e., in thetail-to-body direction) can be sufficiently high to avoid any corruptionof the body-stored state by NDRO signals, which is what makes thereadout “non-destructive.”

In single-read RQL D-register circuit 700, Josephson junction J2junction triggers when the logical lock input LCLK goes “high” (i.e.,when a positive SFQ pulse is provided on the logical clock input LCLK toassert the logical clock input), bringing the superconducting phase ofJosephson junction J2 to 2π radians (“high”). The phase of Josephsonjunction J2 remains “high” if the data input DI is asserted (i.e., witha positive SFQ pulse introduced to data input DI) upon the falling edgeof the logical clock signal provided on input LCLK. Josephson junctionJ2 will “flip back” (i.e., its phase will return to 0 radians, “low”) ifdata input DI is unasserted (“low”) during this time. Consequently, thesuperconducting phase of Josephson junction J2 determines the internalstate of the body 702 of RQL D-register circuit 700. Thus, for example,Josephson junction J2 having a 2π radian superconducting phase cancorrespond to a stored “1” (logical “high”) value, whereas Josephsonjunction J2 having a 0 radian superconducting phase can correspond to astored “0” (logical “low”). In particular, the stored state correspondsto the phase of state-storing Josephson junction J2 during the latterhalf of an operation cycle, as can be noted in timing diagram 1000,particularly during “write 0” operations.

A stored “1” from a triggered Josephson junction J2 in body 702 providesa pre-critical bias current to Josephson junction J5 in tail 704. Underthis biased condition, tail Josephson junction J5 does not triggerunless the read-enabling input NDRO is asserted (goes “high”), whichthen passes the body-stored state to output QO. The triggering ofJosephson junction J5 does not affect the internal state of the body 702(encoded as the superconducting phase of Josephson junction J2), givingthe readout of circuit 700 its non-destructive property.

Because tail Josephson junction J5 can only trigger when body-statestorage Josephson junction J2 has triggered to bring it into its 2πradian superconducting phase and the non-destructive readout input NDROis asserted with a positive SFQ pulse, the NDRO input and correspondingoutput QO can be either wave-pipelined logic (WPL) or phase-mode logic(PML) encoded, and the assertion of the non-destructive readout inputNDRO must arrive after Josephson junction J2 has been properly setup orlogical clock signal provided on input LCLK is de-asserted. With properphase timing of the logical lock and non-destructive readout signalsprovided on inputs LCLK and NDRO, data can be written and read duringthe same clock cycle, speeding memory and computing operations.

The various operational states of circuit 700 will now be explored withreference to the simulation timing diagram 1000 of FIG. 10, reading itsoperation cycles (separated by vertical broken lines) in chronologicalorder from left to right.

“Quiescent inputs”: The circuit 700 begins with no state value stored inits body 702. When all three inputs DI, LCLK, and NDRO are unasserted,the circuit is in a “quiescent inputs” operational state, and output QOis therefore “low.”

“Read 0”: The next operation cycle is a read cycle, in which an NDROpulse 1002 introduced in the latter half of the cycle “reads out” thebody-stored state, which is still “low,” since no write operation haschanged it from its initial value. Thus, output QO remains “low.”

“Write 1 and read”: The next cycle sees all three inputs DI, LCLK, andNDRO asserted to write a logical “high” value as the body-stored stateand enable the reading out of this state to output QO all within thesame operation cycle. The superconducting phase of Josephson junction J2goes “high” (e.g., to 2π radians) 1004 as soon as the write-enablingsignal provided on logical clock input LCLK goes “high.” It stays highafter an assertion SFQ pulse supplied to the data input DI triggers 1006Josephson junction J4. When LCLK transitions low, the “high”superconducting phase of state-storing Josephson junction J2 ismaintained. Instead of Josephson junction J2 untriggering, escapeJosephson junction J3 triggers 1008. The combination of the logicalclock input LCLK going “high” and data input DI going “high” putscircuit 700 into a “write 1” state, causing a “1” to be written to thebody-stored state by maintaining Josephson junction J2 in a 2π radiansuperconducting phase. The phase of Josephson junction J2 goes “high,”even before the data input DI goes “high,” but without data input DIbeing asserted, Josephson junction J2 would return “low” after the writeenable signal LCLK goes “low” (as can be seen at the “Write 0”operation, discussed below). As long as Josephson junction J2 is in a“high” state of 2π radians, it provides pre-critical bias current totail Josephson junction J5, preparing tail Josephson junction J5 topropagate any pulse it receives at input NDRO to output QO.

The written state is read out on output QO immediately, within the sameoperation cycle. The NDRO command is timed later in the operation cyclethan the LCLK command, because any time the write enable signal oflogical clock input LCLK goes high, Josephson junction J2 is asserted toa “high” superconducting phase, meaning that a premature read-outattempt will result in a readout value of “1” regardless of whether a“1” or a “0” is being written. Because the read enable signal NDRO isdelayed in time, the read-out state will, appropriately, be the samestate that is written earlier in the same operation cycle.

The superconducting phase of Josephson junction J5 signifies the readoutof a “1,” and can be interpreted as a logical AND of the superconductingphase of Josephson junction J2 and the read-enabling NDRO command. Thus,sending input NDRO “high” when Josephson junction J2 is in a 2π radiansuperconducting phase (“high”) causes the superconducting phase ofJosephson junction J5 to transition to 2π radians (“high”) andpropagates an SFQ pulse toward output QO. (Accordingly, the plot foroutput QO finally falls to “low” when the plot for the phase ofJosephson junction J5 also falls to “low.”) An attempt to perform areadout when the superconducting phase of Josephson junction J2 is 0radians is not sufficient to trigger Josephson junction J5, so theoutput QO reads “0.” Once again emphasizing the non-destructive readoutoperation of circuit 700, a triggering of Josephson junction J5 does notaffect the phase of Josephson junction J2 (or any of the other Josephsonjunctions in circuit 700) and thus does not change the body-storedlogical circuit state (i.e., the memory element state, when circuit 700is used in a memory).

“Write 0 and read”: The write-enabling logical clock signal provided oninput LCLK goes “high,” but now when the data input DI remainsunasserted, the phase of state-storing Josephson junction J2 drops backto 0 radians, as can be seen in the J2 phase plot at the midpoint of thecycle. In the same cycle, a read-enabling command is issued (i.e., inputNDRO goes “high”), reading out the written state as “0” on QO, becauseJosephson junction J5 does not trigger.

2nd “Write 1 and read,” followed by “Read 1”: These two cycles show thecorrect non-destructive readout behavior expected from two back-to-backoperations. The first readout does not destroy the written “1” state, sowhen it is followed immediately by another read operation, the same “1”is still read-out again, meaning that the first readout has notcorrupted the body-stored state. In the second of these two operations,when the read-enabling signal provided on input NDRO goes “high,” thesuperconducting phase of Josephson junction J2 is already “high,” so thesuperconducting phase of Josephson junction J5, and thus output QO,likewise go “high.”

“Write 0”: The logical clock signal provided on input LCLK goes “high”to activate the write enable while data input DI is “low.” There beingno read operation enabled, the output QO is appropriately “low” at theend of the operation cycle. The superconducting phase of state-storingJosephson junction J2 goes “low,” indicating that a “0” has been writtento the state-storing body 702.

“Read 0”: The read-enabling signal provided on input NDRO goes “high,”,but not causing the superconducting phase of Josephson junction J2 to go“high,” indicating that the “low” stored memory state is preserved,uncorrupted by the read-enabling signal provided on input NDRO. As canbe seen later at the beginning of the next “Write 1” operation, even thecombination of inputs NDRO and LCLK both going “high” is insufficient tocause Josephson junction J5 to trigger and produce an output at thebeginning of an operation cycle.

“Half select without read (0 state)”: The “half-select” condition canarise, for example, during the sending of data to a memory array, whenthe subject circuit is a particular memory element that is not part ofthe addressed bit-line. In such a case, it may be that, as an artifactof the array architecture, the “1” signal sent on data input DI isdelivered in parallel to every bit-line of the memory array. Thus,although data input DI may be “high,” write-enabling logical clock inputLCLK is “low.” Under such a half-select condition, the stored stateshould not change. This cycle of diagram 1000 illustrates the correctbehavior. Even when data input DI is “high,” the combination of “high”data input DI and “low” write enable input LCKL are insufficient totrigger state-storing Josephson junction J2 and change itssuperconducting phase to 2π radians. Thus, the written state stored inthe circuit body 702 remains “low.” The phase of escape Josephsonjunction J3 is likewise unaffected. Read-enabling input NDRO is “low,”meaning no read signal is sent, and output QO remains low.

“Half select with read (0 state)”: This operation cycle illustrates thecombined effect of an asserted data input DI and an asserted read enableinput NDRO on the stored state, i.e., the superconducting phase ofstate-storing Josephson junction J2. Even when the memory state is “0,”inputs DI and NDRO going high do not cause Josephson junction J2 totrigger. The superconducting phase of Josephson junction J2 remains at 0radians. This cycle thus illustrates again the non-destructive readoutfunctionality of circuit 700, even when the circuit is a half-selectedcell in a memory or logic array.

“Write 1”: Data input DI goes “high” and is write-enabled by anassertion of logical clock input LCLK. State-storing Josephson junctionJ2 therefore also triggers to transition to a “high” superconductingphase, but output QO remains “low,” there being no read-enabling signalNDRO and therefore no readout.

“Half select without read (1 state)”: Data input DI is “high,” but writeenable LCLK is “low,” expressing the half-select condition. Thiscombination does not affect the “high” superconducting phase ofstate-storing Josephson junction J2. Escape Josephson junction J3retains its “low” superconducting phase. Read enable input NDRO is“low,” and output QO remains “low,” even though the stored state is“high.”

“Read 1”: This read cycle proves again that the half-select condition ofthe previous cycle did nothing to corrupt the stored “high” state. Whenread enable input NDRO is asserted, output QO is likewise asserted,indicating successful readout of the “1” state written two cycles prior.

“Write 0”: Write enable input LCLK is asserted “high” while data inputDI is “low,” causing the superconducting phase of state-storingJosephson junction J2 to drop to 0 radians. The phase of escapeJosephson junction J3, meanwhile, flips back. Thus, at the end of timingdiagram 1000, circuit 700 is reset to its starting state.

In timing diagram 1000 of FIG. 10, signals provided to inputs LCLK andNDRO are temporally shifted relative to each other, with the indicatedLCLK state in the above description being the state that LCLK goesshortly after the start of the cycle and the indicated NDRO state in theabove description being the state that NDRO goes around the time thatLCLK goes “low,” e.g., shortly after halfway through the cycle. Thephase of Josephson junction J4 is substantially in phase with data inputDI, while the phase of Josephson junction J5 is substantially in phasewith output QO. In the above description, the indicated DI state, andthus also the indicated phase of Josephson junction J4, is the state orphase at the middle of the operation cycle. The indicated QO state, likewith the indicated phases of Josephson junctions J2 and J5, is the stateor phase at the end of the operation cycle. As an example, the circuitcan be designed such that LCKL and NDRO are out of phase with eachother, e.g., 180° out of phase with each other, or 225° degrees out ofphase with each other, so that a previous-cycle read has no effect onthe operation in a current cycle.

FIG. 11 shows a circuit diagram implementing the single-read RQLD-register 600 of FIG. 6 as an example RQL-compatible superconductingcircuit 1100, similar in form and function to circuit 700 of FIG. 7, butreducing, from two to one, the number of DC flux bias transformers inthe circuit by implementing a Y-Δ transform of the central inductancenetwork in the body stage 702 to arrive at body stage 1102, havinginductors LL₁ and LL₂. Tail stage 1104 is unchanged from tail 704.Circuit 1200 of FIG. 12 provides a similar variation of the dual-readRQL D-register 800 of FIG. 8 as compared to circuit 900 of FIG. 9,illustrating that the variation of the latch-based NDRO circuit shown inFIG. 11 can be built to a dual-read or multiple-read configuration byadding on NDRO tail stages 1204, 1206 to nodes 1208, 1210. Tail stages1204, 1206 are unchanged from tail stages 904, 906; only the topology ofbody stage 1202 differs from the topology of body stage 902.

FIG. 13 provides a flip-flop-based NDRO gate 1300 containing the sametail stage 1304 as latch-based NDRO circuit4 700 and nearly the samecomponents in body stage 1302 (as compared to body stage 702) except forinductors L4, L5 substituted for the DC flux bias transformers ofcircuit 700. Body stage 1302 includes a tri-stable flip-flop. Incontrast to the D-latch circuit 700 of FIG. 7, which has two states anda fraction of a Φ₀ (e.g., ½ Φ₀) offset, D flip-flop circuit 1300 hasthree states and no phase offset. The Josephson junction J2 in circuit1300 remains the state storage element, but the process of writing isdifferent than with circuit 700. Logical clock input LCLK remainsasserted (“high”) when not performing a write operation, which preventsa positive pulse from data input DI from triggering Josephson junctionJ2. To perform a write operation, logical clock input LCLK isde-asserted (goes “low”), allowing Josephson junction J2 to trigger uponassertion of data input DI with a positive SFQ pulse (i.e., DI going“high”). Data input DI remains “high” until logical clock input LCLK isreasserted “high” again, thereby “locking” or storing the data inputvalue as the superconducting phase of Josephson junction J2. Data inputDI can then return “low” after logical clock input LCLK goes “high.”Readout functionality is unchanged from the latch-based circuit 700, asthe two circuits contain same tail stage circuitry.

Variants of the flip-flop-based NDRO circuit 1300 provided in FIG. 13are contemplated. Although not illustrated, a flip-flop based circuitsimilar to that of FIG. 13 can be provided having multiple tails, inaccordance with the example illustrated in FIG. 9. Although notillustrated, a flip-flop based circuit similar to that of FIG. 13 can beprovided having the delta body configuration rather than the Y-topologyillustrated in FIG. 13, in view of the delta-configuration circuitsillustrated in FIGS. 11 and 12 as compared to their Y-configurationcounterparts in FIGS. 7 and 9. Although not illustrated, a flip-flopbased circuit similar to that of FIG. 13 can be provided having both thedelta body configuration and multiple tails, in accordance with theexample illustrated in FIG. 12.

The body-tail topologies described above can be adapted to create newcombinational logic gate circuits, such as those illustrated in FIGS.14-16. Primitive gates are also described with reference to FIGS. 17-19.

As one example, FIG. 14 illustrates a multiplexer circuit 1400 composedof two tail structures arranged to perform two AND functions on the leftand right sides of circuit 1400, with a pulse generator portion of thecircuit 1400 at the upper-right of FIG. 14 providing an invert function.Assertion of selector input S sends a signal provided at input B tooutput O, while de-assertion (or non-assertion) of selector input Ssends a signal provided at input A to output O. Asymmetric multiplexercircuit 1400 is organized as two logical halves: an AND half on the leftand an A-NOT-B half on the right. Selector input S splits between leftand right paths from Josephson junction J2, where it either goes throughan inversion via escape Josephson junction J3 to Josephson junction J4Aon the right path, or non-inversion through to Josephson junction J4B onthe left path.

Pulse generator Josephson junctions JP1 and JP2, fed with an AC biasfrom AC bias source 1402, aid in the inversion process at escapeJosephson junction J3. Pulse generator Josephson junctions JP1 and JP2are biased to spontaneously trigger positively and reciprocally everyclock cycle. When selector input S is asserted “high” with a positiveSFQ pulse, Josephson junction J2 triggers, splitting bias current towardboth left and right paths. This bias current, combined with clock pulsecurrent via Josephson junctions JP1 and JP2, causes escape Josephsonjunction J3 to trigger, eliminating provision of a pre-critical biascurrent to Josephson junction J4A that would otherwise permit SFQ pulsesapplied at input A to propagate left and out through output O. The pulsegenerator portion of circuit 1402 formed from Josephson junctions JP1and JP2 and AC bias source 1402, combined with escape Josephson junctionJ3, effectively performs a NOT-S inversion of the selector signal inorder to provide multiplexer functionality. On the left side of circuit1400, when selector input S is asserted, bias current from Josephsonjunction J2 applies a pre-critical bias current to Josephson junctionJ4B, thus permitting SFQ pulses applied at input B to triggers Josephsonjunction J4B, in turn triggering Josephson junction J5B, and sending theB-input pulses out the output.

When selector input S is unasserted (“low”) to select input A as thesource for output O, Josephson junction J2 does not trigger, such that,on the left side of the circuit, Josephson junction J4B is deprived ofbiasing current needed to allow pulses provided at input B to propagaterightward toward output O, and such that, on the right side of thecircuit, the pulse generator at upper right provides bias to Josephsonjunction J4A so that pulses introduced at input A are propagated tooutput O. In contrast to an RQL multiplexer circuit made from primitiveAND and inverter gates, circuit 1400 greatly improves component economyand thus circuit density and cost.

As another example, FIG. 15 illustrates an AND-OR gate circuit 1500provided as a combination of two AND primitive gates (as shown in FIG.17) with the outputs logically OR′d together in a similar fashion towhat is demonstrated with multiplexer 1400 of FIG. 14. Instead of havingselector input S, as in circuit 1400 of FIG. 13, AND-OR gate circuit1500 has two inputs at the top, input C and input D, to provide thelogical function O=(A AND D) OR (B AND C). No inversion is needed oneither input C or D, so the circuit does not include the pulse generatorportion found in multiplexer circuit 1400. Assertion of input C with apositive SFQ pulse to send that input “high” enables pulses provided atinput B to propagate to output O. Likewise, assertion of input D with apositive SFQ pulse to send that input “high” enables pulses provided atinput A to propagate to output O.

As yet another example, FIG. 16 illustrates a demultiplexer gate circuit1600 similar in structure to multiplexer 1400 of FIG. 14 but with thedirection of the data path reversed, such that output O from multiplexercircuit 1400 is arranged instead as data input DI in demultiplexercircuit 1600, and inputs A and B from circuit 1400 are arranged asoutputs OA and OB, respectively, in demultiplexer circuit 1600. Theselector input S remains the same as in circuit 1400. Input DI splitsbetween two paths to Josephson junctions J4A and J4B. Based on theassertion value of the selector input S, SFQ pulses applied at datainput DI are propagated either to output OA or to output OB, but not toboth. Assertion of selector input S (to send it “high”) bias Josephsonjunction J4B, and de-biases Josephson junction J4A, allowing signalsapplied at data input DI propagate to the left, to output OB.Conversely, if select input S is unasserted (“low”), Josephson junctionJ4B is no longer biased, blocking the propagation of data input signalstoward output OB, and biasing Josephson junction J4A with current fromthe pulse generator portion at the upper right of circuit 1600, suchthat signals applied at data input DI are steered to the right, tooutput OA. Demultiplexor 1600 offers simplicity and scalability of usein decoders.

FIG. 17 provides an AND gate circuit 1700 according to the body-tailtopology described herein, where the body stage is reduced to a singleinput B and associated inductor L1 and Josephson junction J2, which bodystage supplies a pre-critical bias current to tail stage Josephsonjunction J5 via linking inductor LL. With a positive SFQ pulse at inputA to assert that input, Josephson junction J5 triggers and produces anoutput of “1” at output Z, fulfilling the AND logical function of Z=AAND B.

FIG. 18 provides an A-NOT-B gate circuit 1800 sharing structuralsimilarities to the multiplexer circuit 1400 described previously. Theupper-right portion of the circuit provides a pulse generator signal,indicated in FIG. 18 as “PULSE GEN.,” as a return-to-zero (RZ) tie-highsignal. When combined with an assertion signal (“1”) provided at inputB, the pulse generator signal causes escape Josephson junction J3 totrigger, thereby starving tail Josephson junction J5 of a pre-criticalbias current that would otherwise allow SFQ pulses provided at input Ato propagate to output Z. Thus, when input B is “high,” input A pulsesare blocked. In absence of a “1” on input B, circuit 1800 allows for thepulse generator to provide the requisite pre-critical bias current totail Josephson junction J5, thereby activating input A to trigger tailJosephson junction J5 and thus produce a “1” at the output Z.

FIG. 19 provides an inverter 1900, otherwise known as a NOT gate,similar in structure to the A-NOT-B gate 1800 of FIG. 18, except thatthe input A is replaced with a second pulse generator circuit portionthat includes Josephson junctions JP1B and JP2B. When combined with anassertion signal (“1”) provided at input I, the first pulse generatorsignal (from first pulse generator circuit portion including Josephsonjunctions JP1A and JP2A and AC bias source 1902) causes escape Josephsonjunction J3 to trigger, thereby starving tail Josephson junction J5 of apre-critical bias current that would otherwise allow second pulsegenerator SFQ pulses provided from second pulse generator (includingJosephson junctions JP1B and JP2B and AC bias source 1904) to propagateto output Z. Thus, when input I is “high,” pulses are blocked fromoutput Z, and when input I is “low,” pulses are propagated to output Z.As such, circuit 1900 accomplishes RQL signal inversion at a relativelylow component cost of seven Josephson junctions and nine inductors, plusthose in any output JTL (as illustrated) and without requiring anyphysically large and high-efficiency transformers as may be involved inother RQL inverter designs.

FIG. 20 displays an oscilloscope screen capture 2000 from a successfultest of latch-based NDRO circuit 700. The waveforms on the upper half ofthe plot 2002 show the I and Q clock, while the waveform on the lowerhalf of the plot 2004 show the non-destructive readout output. Theoscilloscope screen capture demonstrates the correct response from anNDRO memory cell to a series of commands switching the D-latch from alogical “0” state to a logical “1” state under a variety of half-selectand full-select conditions on back-to-back clock cycles. This alsoincludes simultaneous operations of write and read within same cycle.There are a total of eight read commands: four while storing a logical“0” state and four of a logical “1” state, resulting in the four logical“1” outputs 2006 that are displayed. The series of commands is repeatedthree times, 2006, 2008, 2010, for the screen capture shown.

Circuits 100, 700, 900, 1100, and 1200 can form the basis of RQLregister file or other memory designs. In particular, the dual-port (or,more generally, multi-port) read functionality of circuits 100, 900, and1200 provide the capability greatly simplify register files for CPUs andcaches, which require such multi-port output. These circuits thereforeenable much more compact register file architectures than previouslypossible. A “register file” is a hardware array of processor registersin a central processing unit (CPU). Apart from memory, register filesare very close to the computation unit in the CPU layout and theyrequire very fast access and multiple ports, reading in many directions.When a circuit 100, 700, 900, 1100, or 1200 serves as a memory elementin an array of such circuits, DI can serve as a data input, LCLK canserve as a word write enable, and NDRO can serve as a word read enable.Word write enable lines and word read enable lines can run parallelacross the bit-length of a word in the memory. These signals can runorthogonal to the write bit lines and read bit lines, which can runalong the word dimension. Thus, in an array of such memory elements,word write enable lines can be connected to LCLK inputs of therespective elements and word read enable lines can be connected to NDROinputs of the respective elements, while bit write data lines can beconnected to the DI inputs of the respective elements, and bit read datalines can be connected to the QO outputs of the respective elements (touse the signal line nomenclature of FIGS. 6-7).

Thus, FIG. 21 shows an example of an array 2100 of multi-tail NDRO gates2102 arranged as memory or logic elements, each of which can correspond,for example, to any of circuits 100, 900, 1200, or a multi-tail versionof circuit 1300 as described above. Each gate 2102 can have a body B andmultiple tails T. Read lines are illustrated as solid and write linesare illustrated as dashed. Word lines are illustrated as thin horizontallines and bit lines are illustrated as thick vertical lines. Word readenable lines 2104 are represented as thinner solid lines each connectingto the NDRO inputs of tails T in a row. Word write enable lines 2106 arerepresented as thinner broken lines each connecting to the LCLK inputsof bodies B in a row. Bit read data lines 2108 are represented asthicker solid lines each connecting to the QO outputs of tails T in acolumn. Bit write data lines 2110 are represented as thicker brokenlines each connecting to the DI inputs of bodies B in a column. Whilethe bit lines are defined as columns and word lines as rows in thisparticular image, this arrangement is arbitrary and could be reversed.Other connections (e.g., for AC clocks or ground) are omitted from FIG.21 for clarity. The array 2100 can be of any suitable size (i.e., havingany number of columns and rows), and can be used as a memory or as alogic array, e.g., a programmable logic array (PLA) orfield-programmable gate array (FPGA) to output evaluated logicfunctions. In the illustrated example of FIG. 21, two word read enablelines 2104 are associated with each row of NDRO gates 2102 and two bitread data lines 2108 are associated with each column of NDRO gates 2102,but the number of such lines can correspond to the number of tails ineach NDRO gate 2102 and thus can be fewer or greater than two.

The examples described herein provide for memory cells, logic cells,registers, register files, memory arrays, logic arrays, logic gates, andlogic structures of higher performance, higher speed, reduced devicecount (e.g., fewer Josephson junctions and inductors), and greaterfunctionality than existing designs. The examples provide efficient,compact cells for AND, A-NOT-B, and inverter logical functions, and forgates such as multiplexer, demultiplexer, and AND-OR gates. The examplesalso lead to more compact memory unit cells demanding less resourceswith increased functionality (e.g., the capability to write and read atthe same time).

The NDRO circuits and other gates described herein have very goodparametric operating margins, a low component count, and provideefficiency and cost advantages as compared to other implementations. Asone example, by eliminating high-efficiency transformers as compared toother designs, the NDRO circuits and other gates described herein cansave a number of metal layers, e.g., two metal layers, in thefabrication process, which sets the number of process steps and yieldand thereby determines cost. As another example, by not usingnon-transformer-based, direct-coupled designs that contain negligiblenumbers of transformers, the NDRO circuits and other gates describedherein avoid high device counts and large inductances.

What have been described above are examples of the invention. It is, ofcourse, not possible to describe every conceivable combination ofcomponents or methodologies for purposes of describing the invention,but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many furthercombinations and permutations of the invention are possible.Accordingly, the invention is intended to embrace all such alterations,modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of thisapplication, including the appended claims. Additionally, where thedisclosure or claims recite “a,” “an,” “a first,” or “another” element,or the equivalent thereof, it should be interpreted to include one ormore than one such element, neither requiring nor excluding two or moresuch elements. As used herein, the term “includes” means includes butnot limited to, and the term “including” means including but not limitedto. The term “based on” means based at least in part on.

What is claimed is:
 1. A reciprocal quantum logic (RQL) centralprocessing unit (CPU) comprising: a memory comprising an array of RQLnon-destructive readout (NDRO) gate circuits, each NDRO gate circuitcomprising a body circuit comprising one of a D latch or a D flip-flopconfigured to store a logical state, the body circuit being coupled toat least two tail circuits in the NDRO gate circuit and configured tosupply a pre-critical state current to a respective tail Josephsonjunction in each of the at least two tail circuits, each pre-criticalstate current being representative of the stored logical state; whereineach tail circuit is configured to propagate to an NDRO output port ofthe respective tail circuit an output signal corresponding to thelogical AND of the stored logical state with a respective NRDO readenable signal provided to an NDRO input port of the respective tailcircuit, and wherein the propagation of any output signal from any ofthe tail circuits does not affect the logical state stored in the bodycircuit connected to said tail circuits.
 2. The RQL CPU of claim 1,wherein each NDRO gate circuit in the array is configured to have itslogical state both writable and readable in the same operation cycle. 3.The RQL CPU of claim 1, wherein the memory is a register file.
 4. TheRQL CPU of claim 1, wherein the memory is configured as a programmablelogic array.
 5. The RQL CPU of claim 1, wherein the memory is configuredas a field-programmable gate array.
 6. The RQL CPU of claim 1, whereinat least one of the tail circuits comprises: a tail input inductorconnected between an NDRO read-enable input port and the body circuitand configured to receive an SFQ pulse NDRO read-enable signal on theNDRO read-enable input port; a tail Josephson junction connected betweenthe body circuit and a circuit ground; and a tail output inductorconnected between the body circuit and an NDRO output port andconfigured to transmit an SFQ pulse NDRO output signal based on thestored logical state and the NDRO read-enable signal without affectingthe stored logical state.
 7. The RQL CPU of claim 6, wherein the atleast one of the tail circuits comprises no more than one Josephsonjunction and no more than two inductors, exclusive of any outputJosephson transmission line (JTL) connected to the tail output inductor.8. The RQL CPU of claim 6, wherein at least one of the body circuitscomprises a D latch having a data input port and a logical clock inputport each configured to receive SFQ pulses, the D latch comprising: adata input inductor connected between the data input port and a firstnode; a data input Josephson junction connected between the first nodeand the circuit ground; a state storage Josephson junction connectedbetween a second node and the circuit ground; a first DC flux biastransformer connected between a third node and the first node and to aDC flux bias line; a second DC flux bias transformer connected betweenthe second node and the third node and to the DC flux bias line; alogical clock input inductor connected between the logical clock inputport and a fourth node; an escape Josephson junction connected betweenthe fourth node and the second node; and at least one linking inductorconnected between the third node and at least one of the at least twotail circuits connected to the at least one of the body circuits,wherein the first and second DC flux bias transformers are configured toprovide at an initialization time a fraction of a Φ₀ of phase to thedata input Josephson junction and the state storage Josephson junction.9. The RQL CPU of claim 6, wherein at least one of the body circuitscomprises a D latch having a data input port and a logical clock inputport each configured to receive SFQ pulses, the D latch comprising: adata input inductor connected between the data input port and a firstnode; a data input Josephson junction connected between the first nodeand the circuit ground; a state storage Josephson junction connectedbetween a second node and the circuit ground; only a single DC flux biastransformer connected between the second node and the first node and toa DC flux bias line; a logical clock input inductor connected betweenthe logical clock input port and a fourth node; an escape Josephsonjunction connected between the fourth node and the second node; a firstlinking inductor connected between the first node and at least one ofthe at least two tail circuits connected to the at least one of the bodycircuits; and a second linking inductor connected between the secondnode and the at least one of the at least two tail circuits, wherein thesingle DC flux bias transformer is configured to provide at aninitialization time a fraction of a Φ₀ of phase to the data inputJosephson junction and the state storage Josephson junction.
 10. The RQLCPU of claim 6, wherein at least one of the body circuits comprises a Dflip-flop having a data input port and a logical clock input port eachconfigured to receive SFQ pulses, the D flip-flop comprising: a datainput inductor connected between the data input port and a first node; adata input Josephson junction connected between the first node and thecircuit ground; a state storage Josephson junction connected between asecond node and the circuit ground; a first inductor connected between athird node and the first node; a second inductor connected between thesecond node and the third node; a logical clock input inductor connectedbetween the logical clock input port and a fourth node; an escapeJosephson junction connected between the fourth node and the secondnode; and at least one linking inductor connected between the third nodeand at least one of the at least two tail circuits connected to the atleast one of the body circuits, wherein the D flip-flop does not includea DC flux bias transformer connected to a DC flux bias line.
 11. The RQLCPU of claim 1, wherein at least one of the tail circuits comprises nomore than one Josephson junction and no more than two inductors,exclusive of any output Josephson transmission line (JTL) connected tothe tail output inductor.
 12. The RQL CPU of claim 1, wherein at leastone of the body circuits comprises a D latch having a data input portand a logical clock input port each configured to receive SFQ pulses,the D latch comprising: a data input inductor connected between the datainput port and a first node; a data input Josephson junction connectedbetween the first node and the circuit ground; a state storage Josephsonjunction connected between a second node and the circuit ground; a firstDC flux bias transformer connected between a third node and the firstnode and to a DC flux bias line; a second DC flux bias transformerconnected between the second node and the third node and to the DC fluxbias line; a logical clock input inductor connected between the logicalclock input port and a fourth node; an escape Josephson junctionconnected between the fourth node and the second node; and at least onelinking inductor connected between the third node and at least one ofthe at least two tail circuits connected to the at least one of the bodycircuits, wherein the first and second DC flux bias transformers areconfigured to provide at an initialization time a fraction of a Φ₀ ofphase to the data input Josephson junction and the state storageJosephson junction.
 13. The RQL CPU of claim 12, wherein at least one ofthe tail circuits comprises no more than one Josephson junction and nomore than two inductors, exclusive of any output Josephson transmissionline (JTL) connected to the tail output inductor.
 14. The RQL CPU ofclaim 1, wherein at least one of the body circuits comprises a D latchhaving a data input port and a logical clock input port each configuredto receive SFQ pulses, the D latch comprising: a data input inductorconnected between the data input port and a first node; a data inputJosephson junction connected between the first node and the circuitground; a state storage Josephson junction connected between a secondnode and the circuit ground; only a single DC flux bias transformerconnected between the second node and the first node and to a DC fluxbias line; a logical clock input inductor connected between the logicalclock input port and a fourth node; an escape Josephson junctionconnected between the fourth node and the second node; a first linkinginductor connected between the first node and at least one of the atleast two tail circuits connected to the at least one of the bodycircuits; and a second linking inductor connected between the secondnode and the at least one of the at least two tail circuits, wherein thesingle DC flux bias transformer is configured to provide at aninitialization time a fraction of a Φ₀ of phase to the data inputJosephson junction and the state storage Josephson junction.
 15. The RQLCPU of claim 14, wherein at least one of the tail circuits comprises nomore than one Josephson junction and no more than two inductors,exclusive of any output Josephson transmission line (JTL) connected tothe tail output inductor.
 16. The RQL CPU of claim 1, wherein at leastone of the body circuits comprises a D flip-flop having a data inputport and a logical clock input port each configured to receive SFQpulses, the D flip-flop comprising: a data input inductor connectedbetween the data input port and a first node; a data input Josephsonjunction connected between the first node and the circuit ground; astate storage Josephson junction connected between a second node and thecircuit ground; a first inductor connected between a third node and thefirst node; a second inductor connected between the second node and thethird node; a logical clock input inductor connected between the logicalclock input port and a fourth node; an escape Josephson junctionconnected between the fourth node and the second node; and at least onelinking inductor connected between the third node and at least one ofthe at least two tail circuits connected to the at least one of the bodycircuits, wherein the D flip-flop does not include a DC flux biastransformer connected to a DC flux bias line.
 17. The RQL CPU of claim16, wherein at least one of the tail circuits comprises no more than oneJosephson junction and no more than two inductors, exclusive of anyoutput Josephson transmission line (JTL) connected to the tail outputinductor.